Football
Previous topic | Next topic Return to Forum
BRUINS 1
Joined: 1/28/05 Posts: 19,758
Hate to say it, but Sc might be good
Posted Mon, Sep 02 11:20 am
Very impressive QB, much more disciplined D, good receivers . . . . let’s see where we are come week 5-6.
This page is in overload mode. If you wish to read all messages, please click here.
Socalbruins
Joined: 8/24/24 Posts: 615
Shouldn’t be surprising if sc looks better than us
Posted Mon, Sep 02 11:40 am
In response to Hate to say it, but Sc might be good (BRUINS 1)
Look at how Lincoln recruits compared to chip. All Lincoln ever needed was a defense now he might have that with Lynn.
Replies to this subthread

Rabid Bruin
Joined: 9/26/23 Posts: 2,043
I told you they were better than UW
Posted Mon, Sep 02 12:07 pm (Edited Mon, Sep 02 12:08 pm)
In response to Hate to say it, but Sc might be good (BRUINS 1)
USC is not in a rebuild, unlike UW. Riley has had 3 years to build his team.
Replies to this subthread

123456bt
Joined: 1/16/14 Posts: 14,624
two doors down...my good neighbor will not shut up about
Posted Mon, Sep 02 1:40 pm (Edited Mon, Sep 02 1:46 pm)
In response to Hate to say it, but Sc might be good (BRUINS 1)
his dull trollcant war sword. I want to bust it over his head.

They look pretty...

gag me with a spoon.

123456bt
Joined: 1/16/14 Posts: 14,624
Moon Zappa disagrees with ya...she hates those trollsters
Posted Mon, Sep 02 1:52 pm
In response to Hate to say it, but Sc might be good (BRUINS 1)
https://youtu.be/Qb21lsCQ3EM?si=MNlTxTJf4DnbeaRT&t=116

MR.GKD
Joined: 10/10/09 Posts: 3,721
Definitely hard to form the words
Posted Mon, Sep 02 1:58 pm
In response to Hate to say it, but Sc might be good (BRUINS 1)
But yeah, pretty shipshape over there. So at the very least I won't need a vomit bag watching a telecast with broadcasters drooling over mediocre Trojan football pretending it's John Elway and Gale Sayers out there. Well....they still will, but yeah they are pretty good for sure. Go Bruins and I think the EB/Garbers/receivers recipe will be a show of their own.

Maui13
Joined: 3/24/05 Posts: 2,555

Avatars available for donors only
Hate to agree
Posted Mon, Sep 02 4:27 pm
In response to Hate to say it, but Sc might be good (BRUINS 1)
It’s disheartening to see $UC look like a disciplined, structured and tough team. I always felt like Caleb Williams was a me 1st guy. Miller Moss seems to be a better leader and knows how to play smart and make big plays.

Their WRs look like Ohio St and Bama receivers. The transfer RB is tough and made big plays when called upon.

I’m hoping the OL and their DBs falter. If not, they could make the playoffs which would be disastrous.
Replies to this subthread

OswegoBruin
Joined: 11/11/10 Posts: 16,935
This is my point.
Posted Tue, Sep 03 8:50 am
In response to Hate to say it, but Sc might be good (BRUINS 1)
If you pay for good, proven assistants, you get good results. SC saw what Lynn did with decent-ish talent outside of Latu and the Murphys and they took their shot.

Until UCLA is willing to actually pay what it takes to get top coaches into LA, we're not going to return to relevance. That is the lesson the last 30 years have proven, and it's only getting worse with the transfer portal and unchecked NIL.
Replies to this subthread